Monday, August 17, 2026

 

SPEEDING OVER THE HILL

The doctor asked, “Do you want a pneumonia shot?  You know, pneumonia is a Big Danger for older people.”  “Older people!”  I am turning 65 and now, suddenly, am classed in Older People?  I look at her, wondering if she can read my thoughts.  She is young, very young.  

Papering over my reaction to her comment, I say, “O.K.  If you recommend it.”  She has more bad news—osteoporosis, bone density test, low Vitamin D, mammogram.  She thinks I might have to take something for my bones.  I hear, “Looming osteoporosis, dowager’s hump, pain.”  I feel older.  I felt young, alive, vibrant when I came into this examining room.  I feel vulnerable.  I want to put my clothes back on.

I nod my head in agreement.  Inside my head, though, “Not me, Sister!  I took estrogen for years because my then so confident, knowing physician told me it was absolutely necessary to protect my bones.  Now I’m in for a litany of tests for breast cancer because He was so wrong 20 years ago.  Now YOU want me to take a new drug!  FORGETABOUT IT”

I would like to engage this young, self-assured primary care physician in a discussion about the history of miracle drugs.  Remember the women who took the drug that resulted in their daughters getting cancer?  Remember that?  Remember Thalidomide?  Lithium? Did you ever read the article in the NEW YORKER about the life cycle for wonder drugs?  Thirty years, three decades.  The first ten years the drugs are widely touted and prescribed.  The second ten years, questions and lawsuits arise.  The third ten years the poor innocent victims get sicker and sicker.  My mind refuses to go over the cliff that is the next ten years.  I write a book in my head but don’t open my mouth.

She is very busy and professional—too busy for this kind of chitchat.  She types intently into a computer.  In alarm, I flash forward to her typing out my death certificate.  My thoughts go to the fact that this is the young woman who will probably tend to me through my declining years to my death.  My spirits lag further.  She flashes me a smile and says, “Mitzi will be in to give you your pneumonia shot.”   

I lie back on the examining table.  My mind is reeling.  The image of the Grim Reaper appears.  What about my eulogy?  Where will I be buried?  I remember a friend once said the determining factor for funeral attendance is the weather.  I pray for good weather.   My God, I’ve got a lot to do, and I had better get busy!  I wonder if an older doctor might be a good idea, one not so chipper and matter-of-fact, one who knows we all grow older, one who is involved.   Immediately I veto the thought.  Too out-dated.  I need someone who knows about modern medicine.  I feel old.  

Mitzi comes in.  She looks young, very young—16 or 24.  She gives me my pneumonia shot.  Two days later I have a terrible reaction.  I end up in the ER, am admitted to the hospital to the neurological floor.  I am very busy.  I write an encyclopedia’s worth of stuff in my head.  No one seems to believe me when I say the pneumonia shot caused my problem.  Teams of white-coated nodding physicians stand by my bed.  Tests.  A lumbar puncture.  I translate “spinal tap” and rewrite “Miss Evers’ Boys.”  An MRI is scheduled.  My alarm grows.  My inner typist speeds up.  Then, A very big and important man pronounces ‘Bell’s palsy.”  They send me home.  I have aged ten years in a week. 


5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Reminds me of Von Franz' writing (below) in her book Creation Myths...regarding projection...She has a diagram in the first chapter.

A, the human being or the ego in the center of his
field of consciousness, looks at an object, he being the
subject. When there is an original projection, it means
that an archetype has been constellated in the uncon¬
scious, B. The subject stares at the object, C, and can
make no sense of it, but wonders what the hell it is!
Then he gets an idea and conceives of the object as
being so-and-so, but he is not aware of the fact that
the archetype, B, has been constellated in his uncon¬
scious and has conveyed to him the model of the idea
from which he recognizes C; he sees only that the ob¬
ject coincides with his idea. This is what constitutes
the cognition process as a whole.

So one reason for withdrawing a projection is that
the idea of the object does not fit the facts, that some¬
thing limps somewhere and does not coincide with
the facts. The other, very frequent possibility is that
another archetype (D) constellates: a second arche¬
type pushes itself forward in the unconscious and puts
another model, or idea, into the subject’s mind, and
another projection onto the object. The subject then
jumps to this new idea, claiming that this is the truth
and the former idea was an error, an illusion—a pro¬
jection. Looking back, one calls it a projection, but as
long as one is caught in it, as long as the archetype is
validly constellated in one’s unconscious and con¬
scious, one will never call it a projection but will con¬
sider it to be true cognition. The subject then feels
that he is talking about true facts as honestly as he
can. This shifting of archetypes naturally generally
coincides with outer changes in conditions so that cer¬
tain theories do not fit them any longer. As long as we
feel subjectively that we are not talking about projec¬
tions but about the true quality of the object—a spe¬
cial aspect of our Western mentality—then we call it
the scientific truth.

Anonymous said...

Reminds me of Von Franz's writing on projection in her book Creation Myths. She has a nice diagram in the first chapter.

Anonymous said...

I have totally been there...still there? I can relate 100%.

Rose F. Holt said...

I wrote this some years ago and laughed when I came across it recently. My feelings about modern medicine are mostly positive and my more recent experiences O.K. Still, though, this one encounter captures the feeling of absolute, unshakable authority the profession still works hard to embody, and the patient must deal with.. So, picking and choosing, doing my own homework, then proceeding with caution are the guidelines I go by.

Best of luck to you, and thank you for your comment.

Rose F. Holt said...

When time permits, I will read Von Franz's book but thought I would post your comment for other readers who are familiar with it. Thank you for sharing.